The prevalence of autism in women is the same as in men and is about 3%

Females may be just as likely to be autistic as males but boys are up to four times more likely to be diagnosed in childhood.

The Guardian reports on new study finding published in British Medical Journal: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/feb/04/autism-women-men-diagnosis-childhood-adulthood

Research led by the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden scrutinised the diagnosis rates of autism for people born in Sweden between 1985 and 2020. Of the 2.7 million people tracked, 2.8% were diagnosed with autism between the ages of two and 37.

The research calculated that in childhood, boys were diagnosed on average nearly three years earlier than girls – the median age at diagnosis was 15.9 for girls, but 13.1 for boys. Overall, boys were three to four times more likely than girls to be diagnosed with autism under the age of 10, although girls were found to “catch up” by the time they were 20, owing to a rapid increase in autism diagnosis during adolescence.

This research confirms what we (NDSA) see in the gender split of people refered to us by the diagnostic service in Derbyshire, where we see about 60% females due to them being diagnosed later in life compared to males. Given how many people over 37 we see referred ny the diagnostic team, we think the prevalense of is likely to be much higher than 3%.

According to Guardian, the likely reson for disparity in diagnosis times for females and males are not only due to masking, but also due to male bias in the diagnostic tools that are modeled on male presentation, in line with NDSA experience.

Undiagnosed and misdiagnosed women struggle without support and vital understanding of how their brain works and often suffer with mental health ptroblem such as anxiety and depression, that could come to a crisis point.

Dr Conor Davidson, former Royal College of Psychiatrists’ autism champion and clinical lead for Leeds autism diagnostic service, said: “There are many autistic women who have not received a diagnosis, and it is vital that they are able to access a timely assessment and care if they need it.
“Psychiatrists must also be aware of the possibility of autism when they are assessing patients with mental health problems. This can be particularly important for women, whose autism may not have been picked up in childhood.”

And of course it is essential to shorten the waiting time and give access to timely autism diagnosis for both males and females.

1770307638428.png
 
Agreed but post diagnosis there is next to nothing in terms of support available on the NHS and an autism diagnosis seems more to exclude you from standard NHS therapy with nothing modified offered in it's place.
 
Some NHS trusts invested in the NATP training which was brilliant but sadly not all of them. I don't know how well it's being rolled out now that the project has ended, either. Those that did ought to have a better understanding and be offering more support - in theory - funding is always an issue and I don't think we are seen as a priority sadly.
Agreed but post diagnosis there is next to nothing in terms of support available on the NHS and an autism diagnosis seems more to exclude you from standard NHS therapy with nothing modified offered in it's place.
 
Some NHS trusts invested in the NATP training which was brilliant but sadly not all of them. I don't know how well it's being rolled out now that the project has ended, either. Those that did ought to have a better understanding and be offering more support - in theory - funding is always an issue and I don't think we are seen as a priority sadly.
Devon seems to be a total black hole for mental health services, next to nothing available and very few voluntary services. So called Devon MIND is based in Plymouth which is a good hour driving and much worse by public transport. And as I'm rural a so called local group will be a half hour drive or 2 buses. It does seem to be a real post code lottery.
 
And that irritating in itself to not see us as needing funding

How many can't stat in work and then claim benefits as a result

How many are on anxiety/antidepressants medication costing NHS money

How many late diagnosis were put forward for a diagnosis because their mental health tanked
Totally, I was suggested for a diagnosis at 61 for mental health reasons and I've had to really fight to get any help. With a less good employer I would now be unemployed never to work again. It's incredibly short sighted and probably not cost effective. And my MP is Mel Stride who went round saying people with mild anxiety shouldn't take time off work. I've worked with extremely high anxiety when I probably shouldn't have and I can't think of anyone taking time off unless their anxiety was disabling as mine became. Our whole attitude to mental health needs to change and there needs to be a much better understanding of neurodiversity to try and prevent deterioration in our mental health. The current stats for co occuring conditions and numbers out of work when we know many are highly intelligent with useful skills is appalling. It's a waste of talent and so much more could be done.